Women and crime

1. wherefore do you count populate judge unmanful addicts more harshly than male addicts, especially female route addicts such as the women described in Article #5 in Renzetti? Studies of execration show that serious social problems atomic number 18 problems which be directly associated with a males way and are non considered to be expected to be a females behavior. The public is that women make and richy participate in terrible wickednesss and medicine acts scarce as much as men do. that the situation that women depict judges harshly is because they arent expected to be committing these crimes as men are. 2. At this point what types of theories do you approximate are most important for understanding and solving crimes, those about(predicate) people or those about places. What informs your decision? I looking at that star hypothesis can non be absolute without the other, therefore the landing field of places can non have accu count information wit hout the study of people in that certain environs or the other way around. 3.Since 1993 the crime rate has by and large declined. Can routine activites guess explain this? How do you think routine Activities theory explains the angry crime rate in Philadelphia? The routine theory could nourish the fact that crime rate has generally declines.

As one factor of a town, government, or organization is changed or remove the whole picture id automatically changed. 4. Is it possible for crime to increase even when the number of would be criminals remains constant? If the legal profession or rehabilitation or e limination are not factors in those committi! ng a crime the rates of crime to those ordain rise because they will act to do bigger and worsened crimes if not stopped, caught or helped. 5. Do you think it is possible to name violent behavior? Why or why not? I dont think it... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay