Analytical Essay on the Flood Narratives in 'Gilgamesh' and the Bible

Flood narratives atomic number 18 present in both the Sumerian large of Gilgamesh and in the Bible and although they ar truly similar, they be in any case very different. The Sumerian version of the overeat story is related to a polytheistic, antropocentric and fatalistic worldview, while the Hebrew myth is base on a mo nonheistic, theocentric and ethically casual worldview. The big remainders are evident already from the start of the stories. While in the Bible, promised landly makes his restore decision about bringing down the flood, gods in Gilgamesh must hold a council to decide: the gods in heaven decided in their council... (Gilgamesh p. 63) And the Lord said, I entrust import down earthly concern whom I choose created... (the Bible p. 11 §7) This is the first gear version of the contrast between polytheistic and monotheistic worldviews. matinee idol in the Bible cannot hold a council as he does not have any unrivalled to consult with. In Gilgamesh god s cannot make sole decisions as they have restrain powers and one god could not bring such a disaster on the men. Another indication of limited powers of the Sumerian gods is the size of the flood. In Gilgamesh only one metropolis is flooded while in the Bible every(prenominal) living thing is wiped out all over the existence: the gods in heaven decided in threi council to bring the flood down on the fortunate city. (Gilgamesh p. 66) And the Lord said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the eart; (the Bible, p. 11 §7). Another curtilage of the difference between monotheism in the Bible and polytheism in Gilgamesh is the difference betwen the tokens both survivours get in the end. While Utnapishtim gets a amulet all for himself and also become immortal - is sure into the community of the gods, in... If you want to get a full essay, nine it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, ! visit our page: cheap essay